🔗 Share this article

In a first-of-its-kind legal move, San Francisco is set to file what is being called the country's inaugural government lawsuit targeting major food manufacturers concerning ultra-processed foods. The city argues that city and county authorities have been shouldering the substantial costs of managing health conditions linked to the widespread public consumption of these companies' products.

The Primary Allegation of the Case

The city's legal action, to be submitted in the court system, names ten industry giants responsible for producing some of the nation's top-selling food and beverage items. This group reportedly features everything from chicken nuggets and frozen pizzas to crisps and sweetened morning cereals. Notably, the case also covers products like certain breads and granola bars that are often promoted as "nutritious" options.

The filing accuses these companies of carrying out "deceptive business practices" in their marketing and sales. It contends that these tactics contravene state laws concerning deceptive trade and public nuisance. A central assertion is that the manufacturers knew their products could make people sick but sold them anyway.

"I am appalled that generations of kids and parents are being misled and buying food that's not real food," said the city's leading attorney.

Understanding Highly Manufactured Foods

These industrially created products are manufactured using factory methods and contain ingredients not commonly used in a domestic kitchen. These encompass chemical preservatives, flavor enhancers, artificial colors, and binding agents, with virtually zero intact food content.

Research estimates that a dominant majority of the American diet is comprised of foods commonly considered ultra-processed. Concerningly, young people are estimated to get over 60% of their caloric intake from UPFs.

The Proven Dangers

A massive global study, issued recently, found that intake of these products is linked to harm in every major organ system of the body. The review linked these foods with an elevated risk of a multiple chronic diseases, encompassing:

• Cancer
• Excessive weight gain
• Adult-onset diabetes
• Depression
• Heart disease
• Brain function deterioration

The scientists of that review concluded that the proliferation of UPFs is being fueled by large food conglomerates, not personal consumer decisions. They described UPFs as a leading cause of a global "chronic disease pandemic" linked to diet, with food companies focusing on earnings above all else.

Political Agreement on a Specific Topic

This lawsuit signifies a atypical point of concurrence between the politically progressive city of San Francisco and the national leadership. The federal Health and Human Services Secretary has railed against ultra-processed foods, encouraging Americans to cut back on products with excess sugar, sodium, unhealthy fats, dyes, and chemical preservatives as part of a "national wellness" mission.

The city attorney stressed that while he disagrees with the administration on other medical subjects, the evidence on ultra-processed foods is "unquestionable." He commented, "Many the perspectives of this administration are not backed by science, but this is an exception. Even a broken clock is right twice a day."

Implicated Corporations and Past Actions

The defendants implicated by the legal filing reportedly include major players such as:

• The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo
• Kraft Heinz Company
• General Mills and Kellogg
• Nestlé USA and Mondelez International
• Post Holdings, Mars Incorporated, and ConAgra Brands

This action builds upon other legislative actions in California. Earlier this year, the state approved a law that became the first in the U.S. to provide a statutory definition of ultra-processed foods, laying a foundation for potentially banning them from schools. The state has also outlawed certain chemicals, including artificial colors linked to health and behavior issues in children, within school meals.

The city attorney's office has previously succeeded in securing victories against major industries on public health matters, including cases against cigarette manufacturers, paint companies, and opioid manufacturers.

The lawsuit will seek monetary restitution for the costs that local governments shoulder for caring for citizens whose health has been harmed by the dietary reliance of these manufactured products.