🔗 Share this article

Following a notable legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from accessing video footage of the violent event involving influencer Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an order sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Case and Ban

After the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in September, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the review board to assess and rate the available footage. The board initially ruled the content was "unable to be classified", a designation that empowered the regulator to order social media companies to geo-block the posts for users in Australia.

The platform X filed an appeal for a pair of videos related to the Kirk incident. It also appealed a comparable ban on a separate video—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been deemed "refused classification".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the bystanders.

X maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or objectionable, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of public importance that generated widespread discussion". The platform drew a parallel between the video and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the review board ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary might have met that threshold. As a result, the board changed the classification of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

Some on the board disagreed, arguing the video was "content designed for sharing for the likely purposes of entertainment and/or benefit (such as likes, shares, or views)". They also argued the comparison to the Zapruder JFK film was invalid, as that footage was made public years after the assassination, "once emotions around the matter had subsided".

Response Following the Outcome

In a statement on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the decision.

"We challenged this decision to uphold free speech and the critical nature of access to information about matters of public significance. We remain committed to safeguarding these principles."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner acknowledged the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material being displayed to users under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

In related news, the eSafety commissioner has not issued formal notices to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the content were distressing, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to use warning labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on such content in accordance with their existing community guidelines.