🔗 Share this article

At the time Microsoft announced a substantial cost hike for its office suite, customers were allegedly offered a limited selection: either accept the increased rate including artificial intelligence tools or terminate their subscription.

According to Australia's consumer watchdog, the firm allegedly did not reveal a third option that allowed users to keep using the application at the original price excluding the artificial intelligence feature, called Copilot.

Court Action Launched by Oversight Body

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has taken the technology company to the national judiciary, alleging that the corporation deceived approximately 2.7 million local personal and family subscribers.

The regulatory authority asserts that communications sent to users only outlined a pair of choices: accepting the increased fee or ending the plan.

It is claimed that Microsoft's electronic messages and online announcement were inaccurate or deceptive, suggesting that customers had to accept the costlier Copilot-integrated subscriptions, while the sole alternative choice was to discontinue, the head of the commission, Gina Cass-Gottlieb, stated.

Hidden Alternative Discovered

The regulator alleges that a third choice, referred to as standard plans, was available but was withheld from subscribers.

This particular plan allowed members to keep the features of their existing subscription without Copilot at the previous reduced price.

Consumers were solely presented with this alternative when they started terminating their subscription, according to the ACCC.

Cost Hikes and User Consequences

The annual subscription price for the Microsoft 365 personal plan rose by 45% from $109 AUD to $159 with the AI tool added.

The family plan experienced a 29% increase, jumping from $139 to $179 annually.

The corporation informed auto-renewing customers about the Copilot integration and upcoming cost adjustment through a couple of messages and a online article.

We will allege in the legal proceeding that Microsoft deliberately omitted mention to the standard options in its notifications and hid their existence until after customers initiated the cancellation process to boost the number of consumers on higher-priced Copilot-integrated subscriptions, Cass-Gottlieb continued.

Essential Tools and Few Alternatives

The office apps featured in the software packages are vital in many people's daily activities, and considering there are few alternatives to the bundled package, terminating may not have been a practical choice for subscribers.

Consumers may have opted for the standard subscription if they had been informed of all the viable choices, as stated by the commission.

Probe and Potential Penalties

The commission's inquiry relied on a large quantity of user complaints as well as online commentary from platforms including Reddit.

The regulatory body is seeking orders including fines, injunctions, formal statements, consumer redress and costs.

The maximum penalty could be the larger of $50m, three times the overall gains obtained, or thirty percent of the company's modified revenue during the breach period.

Company Response

Consumer trust and transparency are key focuses for the organization, and we are reviewing the commission's claim in depth, a Microsoft spokesperson stated.

We continue to be dedicated to cooperating positively with the oversight body and making certain our procedures comply with all legal and ethical standards.