🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that started out as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include functions where Black people are remunerated to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A campaign to erase Black history and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how little it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at an educational institution, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.